From Purpose-Driven to Purpose-Washed: The Rise and Fall of Brand Integrity

In his widely acclaimed book Start With Why, Simon Sinek articulates a compelling argument: “People don’t buy what you do, they buy why you do it.” This belief has been the guiding principle behind some of the most successful brands of the modern era—Amazon, Tesla, Apple, and Microsoft—whose founders prioritized impact over mere profit. However, in today’s branding landscape, many companies have shifted from purpose-driven to purpose-washed, using purpose as a marketing tool rather than a true commitment.
The Power of Purpose in Branding
Table of Contents
KIND, the snack brand, has made its mission clear: to create a kinder world, beginning with food. This is not a hollow statement but a philosophy embedded in its business operations. Through its “Ingredients You Can See & Pronounce” initiative, KIND emphasizes transparency by using real, whole ingredients while avoiding artificial additives. Beyond nutrition, its KIND Foundation supports social causes such as racial equity and mental well-being, ensuring that the brand’s values are evident in its actions, not just in its advertising.
Patagonia, another purpose-driven pioneer, takes an even more radical stance. Its mission—“We’re in business to save our home planet”—is not just rhetoric. The company donates 1% of its sales to environmental nonprofits, encourages customers to repair rather than replace their gear, and even sued the U.S. government to protect national parks. In a move that stunned the business world, Patagonia’s founder, Yvon Chouinard, transferred ownership of the company to a trust dedicated to combating climate change, ensuring that all future profits contribute to environmental protection.
These are examples of purpose done right—authentic, actionable, and integral to the brand’s DNA. However, not all companies manage to strike this delicate balance. When brands fail to align their stated purpose with their actual practices, they risk falling into the trap of purpose-washing—a marketing gimmick disguised as corporate activism.
The pitfalls of moving from purpose-driven to purpose-washed
The backlash against purpose-washing is real, and it can have dire consequences for brands that fail to practice what they preach. Adidas provides a cautionary tale. In 2022, the company positioned itself as a champion of diversity, inclusion, and LGBTQ+ rights. However, internal reports revealed a toxic workplace culture rife with allegations of racism and discrimination. The disconnect between Adidas’ external messaging and its internal reality damaged its credibility, leading to declining sales and a bruised reputation.
Bud Light offers another example. In 2023, the beer brand partnered with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney to promote inclusivity. What followed was a politically charged backlash, resulting in boycotts from conservative consumers and a dramatic decline in sales. Worse still, Bud Light failed to stand firm in its convictions, retracting its stance in an attempt to appease both sides—ultimately alienating both. The brand lost its position as America’s top-selling beer to Modelo, proving that half-hearted activism can do more harm than good.
Even sustainability claims are not immune to scrutiny. H&M, long criticized for its fast-fashion model, attempted to reposition itself with its “Conscious Collection,” marketed as an eco-friendly alternative. Investigations soon revealed that many of the products were not significantly more sustainable than the rest of the brand’s offerings. In 2022, the Norwegian Consumer Authority accused H&M of greenwashing, leading to lawsuits and a decline in consumer trust. The lesson? Consumers demand real sustainability efforts, not just marketing buzzwords.
Does Purpose Still Matter?
Given these missteps, some might question whether brand purpose still holds value. The answer is a resounding yes—but with a caveat. A purpose-driven approach remains a key driver of brand loyalty, but data suggests it is not the primary factor influencing purchasing decisions. In Human Centric Group, we tried to answer this question by looking into the GWI database. Product quality remains the top reason consumers choose a brand, followed by financial incentives like discounts or rewards. Brand love, that is directly linked with the purpose of each brand, ranks third, proving that while consumers appreciate values-driven brands, they will not compromise on quality for the sake of ideology.
Data Source, GWI 2025
Can Purpose-Driven Brands Be More Profitable?
Several studies suggest that brands with a genuine, well-integrated purpose often outperform competitors. A Zeno Group study found that consumers are four to six times more likely to buy from, trust, and advocate for purpose-driven brands. Similarly, research from Harvard Business Review indicates that companies with a strong purpose attract better talent, foster deeper customer loyalty, and experience higher revenue growth over time.
However, not every company with a purpose-driven model succeeds financially. Execution is key. Brands must ask themselves:
- Is our purpose aligned with our brand DNA?
-
- A mission must be credible and relevant to the industry. Danone’s purpose—“bringing health through food to as many people as possible”—is a natural fit, whereas a soft drink brand claiming to “end world hunger” would ring hollow.
- Is our purpose relevant to our target audience?
-
- Purpose should resonate with the consumer base. When launching Sodastream in Poland, PepsiCo adjusted its messaging from “Be green = be good” to “Be green = be cool” to better align with local attitudes toward sustainability.
- Can we deliver on our purpose?
-
- A compelling mission statement on a website means little without tangible actions. As Adidas, Bud Light, and H&M have learned the hard way, failing to deliver on promises can lead to backlash and lost revenue.
Nike: A Case of Purpose Misalignment?
Nike has long been a model of purpose-driven branding, with its mission—“Bringing inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world”—reinforced by groundbreaking campaigns and a commitment to social issues. However, recent struggles raise the question: is Nike still purpose-driven, or is it beginning to shift from purpose-driven to purpose-washed in the eyes of consumers?
The brand has struggled to maintain its dominance in performance footwear, facing stiff competition from emerging brands like On Running and Hoka. Both competitors have integrated genuine innovation and a strong brand purpose into their strategies. On Running’s purpose—“Igniting the human spirit through movement”—is backed by technological advancements like CloudTec® cushioning and a fully recyclable, subscription-based shoe. Hoka’s mission—“Empowering all athletes to feel like they can fly”—is reflected in its max-cushion design, which appeals to a broad audience beyond elite athletes.
Similarly, New Balance has gained market share by reinforcing its purpose: “We champion those who are fearlessly driven by their passions.” By maintaining local manufacturing in the U.S. and U.K., investing in underserved communities, and forming authentic athlete partnerships, New Balance has demonstrated how a strong purpose—when matched with real action—can lead to growth.
The Final Verdict
Brand purpose is not a silver bullet, nor is it a substitute for innovation and product quality. When executed authentically, as seen with Patagonia, KIND, and On Running, it can foster deep brand loyalty and drive profitability. However, when it becomes a hollow marketing ploy, as seen with Adidas, Bud Light, and H&M, it can backfire spectacularly.
The lesson for brands? Purpose must be authentic, actionable, and aligned with core business values. The shift from purpose-driven to purpose-washed can be gradual but damaging. In an era where consumers demand transparency, brands that fail to deliver real impact will struggle to maintain trust and loyalty. Consumers are increasingly savvy, and in an era of transparency, only those who walk the talk will reap the rewards. For brands that fail to do so, purpose-washing may not just be a PR disaster—it could be a death sentence. Check other articles on our blog to understand how real people behave and most importantly, why.